Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
On his direct examination, the defendant testified that the instant incident occurred while he was on parole, and that the arresting officer decided to arrest him only after the officer learned that the defendant was on parole. Therefore, the trial court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by permitting the prosecutor to attack the defendant's credibility on cross examination by asking him a few questions concerning...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
