ERICKSON v. ATKINSON

87-5940; CA A62548.

812 P.2d 2 (1991)

Gerald E. ERICKSON, Respondent, v. Robert ATKINSON and Bob Atkinson Logging & Lumber, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Defendants. Manifold Business and Investments, Inc., an Oregon Corporation, Appellant, v. Gerald E. Erickson and Kathleen Erickson, Respondents, and Reuben Lenske, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided May 22, 1991.

Reconsideration Denied July 24, 1991.

Review Denied August 20, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ivan J. Vesely, Portland, argued the cause for appellants. With him on the brief was Reuben Lenske, pro se.

John K. McIlhenny, Jr., Portland, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Sorensen-Jolink, Trubo & Koch, Portland.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.


RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Manifold Business and Investment, Inc. (Manifold) and Reuben Lenske appeal from a judgment for plaintiff in this timber trespass action.1 They make no assignment of error and, in other respects, their brief comes nowhere close to compliance with our rules. Nevertheless, because one error is apparent on the face of the record, we reverse in part.

Plaintiff originally named Lenske as a defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases