Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that the hearing court should have suppressed testimony by the victim and the eyewitness as to showup identifications in which they participated on the grounds that those procedures were unduly suggestive and not required by any exigent circumstances. We disagree.
Procedures that are less than ideal may be acceptable in the interest of a prompt identification. This is particularly true in a case...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
