TAPLETT v. KHELA

No. 25195-3-I.

60 Wn. App. 751 (1991)

807 P.2d 885

RAWLAND F. TAPLETT, ET AL, Respondents, v. BHAG SINGH KHELA, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

April 1, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel Brink and Brink & Todd, for appellants.

Timothy Bradbury and Armstrong, Alsdorf, Bradbury & Maier, for respondents.


GROSSE, C.J.

Rawland Taplett and Mary Taplett (Taplett) brought this action against Bhag Singh Khela and Nachhatter Kaur Khela (Khela) for contribution on partnership debts and recovery on a promissory note. Khela counterclaimed for a partnership winding up and accounting. The trial court concluded that Taplett's claim was not barred by the statute of limitation, ordered Khela to pay Taplett $46,390 and awarded Taplett...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases