BOBEY v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS

No. C1-90-2194.

472 N.W.2d 337 (1991)

Alice BOBEY, et al., Appellants, v. CITY OF MINNEAPOLIS, et al., Defendants, M.A. Mortenson, Respondent.

Supreme Court of Minnesota.

August 2, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Daniel W. Schermer, Lawrence R. Altman, Schermer, Altman & Izek, Minneapolis, for appellants.

James Duffy O'Connor, Bruce Jones, Faegre & Benson, Minneapolis, for respondent.

Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.


GARDEBRING, Justice.

We granted the petition for further review of plaintiff Alice Bobey, her attorney individually and the law firm for the limited purpose of examining that portion of an unpublished decision of the court of appeals affirming sanctions imposed on counsel pursuant to Minn.R.Civ.P. 11 and Minn. Stat. § 549.21 (1988). We reverse and remand.

In Uselman v. Uselman, 464 N.W.2d 130 (Minn.1990), we...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases