PER CURIAM.
We affirm the defendant's convictions. We also affirm his sentences in all cases except for circuit court case numbers 87-76 and 87-77. In those two cases, which occurred prior to the 1988 amendment to the habitual offender statute, the trial court erred in sentencing the defendant as an habitual offender without first finding that an enhanced sentence was necessary to protect the public. See Smith v. State,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.