1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.W.2d
  4. 473 N.W.2d
  5. 473 N.W.2d 333 (1991)
 

STINSON v. CLARK EQUIPMENT CO.

No. C4-90-2626.

473 N.W.2d 333 (1991)

James STINSON, Appellant, v. CLARK EQUIPMENT COMPANY, defendant and third-party plaintiff, Respondent. LANO EQUIPMENT, INC., et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs, v. MIDWEST BRASS & ALUMINUM, INC., Third-Party Defendant, and Lumbermen's Underwriting Alliance, Intervenor.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Denied September 13, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steve Gaskins and Bradley J. Ayers, Cosgrove, Flynn, Gaskins & Haskell, Minneapolis, for appellant.

David G. Martin and Michael R. Doherty, Doherty, Rumble & Butler, P.A., St. Paul, for respondent.

Considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and HUSPENI and AMUNDSON, JJ.

OPINION

FOLEY, Judge.

Appellant James Stinson challenges the district court's determination that a Rule 68 offer of judgment, plus costs and disbursements does not include prejudgment interest. Respondent Clark Equipment Company maintains the district court's award of costs and disbursements should be remanded or denied because the district court's findings were insufficient. We affirm in part, reverse in part and remand.

FACTS

Stinson...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases