STATE v. MALINOVSKY

No. 90-317.

60 Ohio St. 3d 20 (1991)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. MALINOVSKY, APPELLEE.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 15, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gregory A. White, prosecuting attorney, and Jonathan E. Rosenbaum, for appellant.

Smith & Smith, Daniel G. Wightman and Gerald M. Smith, for appellee.

Michael Miller and Alan C. Travis, urging reversal for amicus curiae, Ohio Prosecuting Attorneys Association.


WRIGHT, J.

The General Assembly has granted prosecutors the right of appeal from an adverse ruling on a motion to suppress evidence prior to final disposition of a criminal prosecution. Crim. R. 12(J) reads:

"* * * The state may take an appeal as of right from the granting of a motion for the return of seized property, or from the granting of a motion to suppress evidence if, in addition to filing a notice of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases