Judgment unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum:
We conclude that the court did not err in limiting the cross-examination of the prosecution witnesses concerning their prior criminal acts. "The extent to which disparaging questions, not relevant to the issue, but bearing on the credibility of a witness, may be put upon cross-examination is discretionary with the trial court, and its rulings are not subject to review unless it clearly appears that the discretion...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
