1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 780 F.Supp.
  5. 780 F.Supp. 16 (1991)
 

LIPSCOMBE v. RIDLEY

Civ. A. No. 91-1090 (CRR).

780 F.Supp. 16 (1991)

Veldon LIPSCOMBE, Plaintiff, v. Walter RIDLEY, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, District of Columbia.

December 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Veldon Lipscombe, pro se.

John Payton, Corp. Counsel, Martin L. Grossman, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Civ. Div., George C. Valentine, Asst. Corp. Counsel, D.C. Chief, General Litigation Section, William R. Morel, Asst. Corp. Counsel, Office for District of Columbia, for defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.

On August 29, 1991, the Court dismissed the above-captioned action pursuant to Local Rule 108(b). The defendant Walter Ridley1 had filed a Motion to Dismiss, or, in Alternative, for Summary Judgment on June 28, 1991.2 Because the plaintiff failed to respond, the Court treated the motion as conceded....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases