1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 62 Ohio
  5. 62 Ohio St.3d 17 (1991)
 

STATE, EX REL. CITY OF BEDFORD v. BD. OF ELECTIONS OF CUYAHOGA CTY.

No. 90-2123.

62 Ohio St.3d 17 (1991)

THE STATE, EX REL. CITY OF BEDFORD, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF ELECTIONS OF CUYAHOGA COUNTY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided September 25, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Calfee, Halter & Griswold, Mark I. Wallach, John E. Gotherman and Smith R. Brittingham IV, for appellant.

Stephanie Tubbs Jones, Prosecuting Attorney, and Michael P. Butler, for appellee board of elections.

Lee I. Fisher, Attorney General, and Catherine M. Cola, for appellee Secretary of State.

Per Curiam.

For a writ of mandamus to issue, Bedford must have a clear legal right to the performance of a clear legal duty and no adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Brookpark Entertainment, Inc., v. Cuyahoga Cty. Bd. of Elections (1991), 60 Ohio St.3d 44, 45-46, 573 N.E.2d 596, 598-599. For the reasons that follow, we hold that Bedford is entitled, by virtue of the city's powers...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases