SCHINKELSHOEK v. EMPIRE SEED

No. 10527-0-III.

60 Wn. App. 733 (1991)

806 P.2d 1263

HENRY SCHINKELSHOEK, ET AL, Appellants, v. EMPIRE SEED COMPANY, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division Three.

February 7, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Francis S. Floyd and Betts, Patterson & Mines, P.S., for appellants.

Americo Richard Maloney and Carney, Stephenson, Badley, Smith & Spellman, for respondents.


MUNSON, J.

Henry Schinkelshoek appeals the dismissal by summary judgment of defendant Empire Seed Company from this negligence action. He contends that whether he lost his status as business invitee when he drove Empire Seed's golf cart without permission, because he reasonably believed he was invited to do so, creates a genuine issue of material fact. We disagree and affirm.

The facts, interpreted in the light most favorable to Mr. Schinkelshoek, are as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases