Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant's motion which was to suppress the statements he made to the detectives at his residence and at the station house. The questioning at the defendant's residence was in a noncustodial setting, and the police did not exert a coercive influence over him (see, Minnesota v Murphy,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.