STATE v. SHEPARD

No. C8-90-2287.

473 N.W.2d 318 (1991)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Leona Faye SHEPARD, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted August 29, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Earl E. Maus, Cass County Atty., Jon P. Eclov, Asst. County Atty., Walker, for respondent.

Jay E. Sommer, Pine River, for appellant.

Considered and decided by FOLEY, P.J., and HUSPENI and AMUNDSON, JJ.


OPINION

HUSPENI, Judge.

Appellant contends the evidence is insufficient to support a verdict of driving while under the influence of alcohol. The jury acquitted her of driving with an alcohol concentration of .10 or more, but found her guilty of careless driving and driving under the influence of alcohol. We find the evidence insufficient to support her conviction of driving while under the influence and reverse.

FACTS

On November 19, 1989...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases