MATTER OF SURATWALA v. CASEY


172 A.D.2d 613 (1991)

In the Matter of J.R. Suratwala, Appellant, v. Daniel Casey, as Chairman of The Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay, et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

April 8, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

Contrary to the petitioner's arguments, we find that the determination of the respondent Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Oyster Bay is supported by substantial evidence and was not illegal, arbitrary or an abuse of discretion (see, Matter of Fuhst v Foley, 45 N.Y.2d 441). The petitioner has failed to establish that strict compliance with the zoning law will...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases