1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 62 Wn.
  5. 62 Wn. App. 717 (1991)
 

BARRETT v. PACHECO

No. 27115-6-I.

62 Wn. App. 717 (1991)

815 P.2d 834

ROBERT L. BARRETT, ET AL, Appellants, v. RUDOLPH PACHECO, ET AL, Respondents.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

September 9, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul Hanson and Gary I. Greenbaum, for appellants.

Robert N. Gellatly, Lish Whitson, and Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, and Michael D. Kraft, for respondents.

AGID, J.

Robert Barrett and Cindi Ketchum, husband and wife,1 appeal the trial court's order of summary judgment dismissing their negligent supervision action against Rudolph and Margaret Pacheco. Barrett contends that the Pachecos knew or should have known about their son's "dangerous proclivity" and that they failed to take reasonable measures to control such proclivity. We affirm.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases