At issue in this case is respondent's entitlement to first-party benefits under the "no-fault" policy held by petitioner's insured to compensate him for injuries suffered as a result of an accident which occurred in the early morning hours of December 13, 1984. The evidence on the record shows that respondent had stopped his car, which was not insured, on Grand Central Parkway in order to assist a disabled motorist. After pulling over, he left his car and, after removing...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
