NORTH HAVEN v. PLANNING & ZONING COMMISSION

(14234)

220 Conn. 556 (1991)

TOWN OF NORTH HAVEN v. PLANNING AND ZONING COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF HAMDEN ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released December 10, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Steven R. Rolnick, for the appellants (named defendant et al.).

Bourke G. Spellacy, with whom were Karen P. Blado and, on the brief, Alyce L. Raboy, for the appellants (defendant Homart Development Company et al.).

Robert K. Ciulla, with whom was Charles R. Andres, for the appellee (plaintiff).

PETERS, C. J., SHEA, GLASS, COVELLO and BORDEN, JS.


BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether proposed amendments to the Hamden zoning regulations considered by the named defendant, the Hamden planning and zoning commission (commission), "concern[ed] [a] project" within the meaning of General Statutes § 8-3h1 so that the commission was required to give the plaintiff, the adjoining town of North Haven, notice of the proposed amendments pursuant

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases