GUARINO v. EXIDE CORP.


174 A.D.2d 602 (1991)

Paul Guarino, Appellant, v. Exide Corporation, Defendant and Third-Party Plaintiff-Respondent. Reader's Digest Association, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

June 10, 1991


Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

Viewing the evidence in a light most favorable to the plaintiff, and giving him the benefit of every inference which reasonably could be drawn therefrom (see, Schimmenti v Ply Gem Indus., 156 A.D.2d 658; McCloud v Marcantonio, 106 A.D.2d 493), we find that there was no rational process by which the jury could have...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases