Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
Contrary to the defendant's contention, the Supreme Court did not improvidently exercise its discretion by refusing to strike that portion of the plaintiff's supplemental bill of particulars which itemized damages for lost earnings. While a supplemental bill of particulars may not be used to claim a "wholly new category of special damages" (Pearce v Booth Mem. Hosp.,
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.