1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 233 Cal.App.3d
  5. 233 Cal.App.3d 537 (1991)
 

ROSE v. SCOTT

Docket No. A049770.

233 Cal.App.3d 537 (1991)

284 Cal. Rptr. 487

THOMAS E. ROSE et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. DANIEL ROBERT SCOTT et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

August 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Smith, Wright & Peterson and William F. Taylor for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Charles O. Triebel, Jr., for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WHITE, P.J.

Plaintiffs Thomas E. Rose and Beverly J. Todd appeal from a judgment dismissing their action against defendants Daniel Robert Scott and Novella Simonson for failure to bring the action to trial within the time prescribed by law. (Code Civ. Proc., § 583.360.)1 Based on the enactment of section 583.340 and the Law Revision Commission comment thereto we reverse the judgment.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases