IN RE ALEXANDER V.

(9408)

25 Conn. App. 741 (1991)

IN RE ALEXANDER V.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released September 17, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John R. Williams, with whom were Diane Polan and, on the brief, Sue L. Wise, for the appellant (respondent).

Susan T. Pearlman, assistant attorney general, with whom were Patricia Lilly Harleston, assistant attorney general, and, on the brief, Richard Blumenthal, attorney general, and Nina F. Elgo and Carolyn K. Querijero, assistant attorneys general, for the appellee (petitioner).

Howard Lawrence, for the minor child.

DUPONT, C. J., NORCOTT and HEIMAN, JS.


DUPONT, C. J.

The respondent appeals from the judgment that terminated her parental rights with respect to her minor son. The respondent contends (1) that the federal and state constitutions1 imposed a duty on the trial court to hold a hearing to determine if she was competent to understand the termination proceeding and to assist counsel effectively and (2) that she was ineffectively represented by counsel. The respondent does not challenge...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases