1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 229 Cal.App.3d
  5. 229 Cal.App.3d 528 (1991)
 

HOLLIDAY v. CITY OF MODESTO

Docket No. F012743.

229 Cal.App.3d 528 (1991)

280 Cal. Rptr. 206

JERRY ALLEN HOLLIDAY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CITY OF MODESTO et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

April 18, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Davis, Reno & Courtney, Alan C. Davis, Diane Ravnik and Cindy O'Hara-Varela for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stan T. Yamamoto, City Attorney, Thomas J. Quinlan and Michael Milich, Deputy City Attorneys, for Defendants and Respondents.

[Opinion certified for partial publication.†]

OPINION

THAXTER, J.

May a public employer order one of its employees, on pain of suspension, demotion, or termination, to submit to drug testing without first complying with the "meet and confer" requirements of the Meyers-Milias-Brown Act (Gov. Code,1 § 3500 et seq., hereinafter MMBA)? Under the circumstances...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases