EISENBERG v. EISENBERG


169 A.D.2d 588 (1991)

Louise Eisenberg, Respondent, v. Morton S. Eisenberg, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

January 29, 1991


We do not find the award of pendente lite maintenance excessive. We first recognize that the purpose of temporary maintenance is to assure the reasonable needs of a dependent spouse during pendency of a divorce proceeding pursuant to which the previously enjoyed standard of living is a relevant consideration but the applicant's actual financial need is the predominant consideration. (Ritter v Ritter, 135 A.D.2d 421, 422.) In evaluating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases