RAGUSA v. LAW DEPT.


152 Misc.2d 602 (1991)

In the Matter of Anthony Ragusa, Jr., Doing Business as The Stereo Advantage, Petitioner, v. New York State Department of Law et al., Respondents.

Supreme Court, New York County.

April 28, 1991


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Saperston & Day for petitioner. Robert Abrams, Attorney-General, respondent pro se, and for New York State Department of Law, respondent.


MARTIN B. STECHER, J.

In this CPLR article 78 proceeding, petitioner seeks judgment to compel respondent to comply with petitioner's request for information pursuant to the Freedom of Information Law (FOIL) (Public Officers Law art 6). The items sought are documents and records in the possession of the Attorney-General generated in a United States District Court case entitled State of New York v Matsushita...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases