1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 178 A.D.2d
  5. 178 A.D.2d 573 (1991)
 

AROSA v. HILTON HOTELS CORP.

178 A.D.2d 573 (1991)

Harry Arosa et al., Respondents, v. Hilton Hotels Corporation et al., Respondents, and Otis Elevator Company, Defendant and Second Third-Party Plaintiff-Appellant. Federal Distributing Corporation et al., Second Third-Party Defendants-Respondents. (Action No. 1.) Orlando Williams, Respondent, v. New York Hilton Joint Venture et al., Defendants and Third-Party Plaintiffs-Respondents. Otis Elevator Company, Third-Party Defendant-Appellant; Federal Distributing Company, Third-Party Defendant-Respondent. (Action No. 2.)

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Second Department.

December 23, 1991

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with one bill of costs.

CPLR 3103 (a) provides that "[t]he court may at any time on its own initiative, or on motion of any party or witness, make a protective order denying, limiting, conditioning or regulating the use of any disclosure device. Such order shall be designed to prevent unreasonable annoyance, expense, embarrassment, disadvantage, or other prejudice to any person or the courts".

Here, it cannot be said that...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases