1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 217 Conn.
  5. 217 Conn. 532 (1991)
 

SPITZER v. HAIMS & CO.

(13857)

217 Conn. 532 (1991)

HORTON SPITZER v. HAIMS AND COMPANY ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released February 26, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Lawrence M. Lapine, with whom, on the brief, was Christopher R. Bello, for the appellant (plaintiff).

William O. Riiska, with whom was Gregory T. D'Auria, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Duncan B. Hume, for the appellees (defendant W. Parker Seeley et al.).

SHEA, GLASS, HULL, BORDEN and F. X. HENNESSY, Js.

BORDEN, J.

The principal issue in this appeal is whether the trial court properly allowed the jury to ask questions of the witnesses. The plaintiff, Horton Spitzer, brought a professional malpractice suit against his former lawyers, the defendants W. Parker Seeley and Seeley's law firm, Pullman, Comley, Bradley and Reeves, and against his former accountants, the defendants William Arnone and Arnone's accounting firm, Haims and Company, to recover losses incurred in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases