GOLDSTEIN v. CITY OF WILMINGTON


598 A.2d 149 (1991)

Louis GOLDSTEIN, Defendant Below, Appellant, v. CITY OF WILMINGTON, Plaintiff Below, Appellee. Louis GOLDSTEIN, Petitioner Below, Appellant, v. MUNICIPAL COURT FOR the CITY OF WILMINGTON, and Judge Carl Goldstein, Respondents Below, Appellees.

Supreme Court of Delaware.

Order Issued: September 6, 1991.

Reargument: September 23, 1991.

Opinion Issued: October 9, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Victor F. Battaglia and Philip B. Bartoshesky of Biggs and Battaglia, Wilmington, for appellant.

Donald L. Gouge, Jr. of Heiman, Aber & Goldlust, Wilmington, and Michael P. Reynolds of City of Wilmington Law Dept., for appellees City of Wilmington, Municipal Court for the City of Wilmington and Judge Carl Goldstein.

Before CHRISTIE, C.J., HORSEY and MOORE, JJ.


Motion for Reargument (No. 147, 1991): September 23, 1991.

HORSEY, Justice:

In this consolidated appeal, the appellees filed a motion to affirm and this Court thereupon issued a notice to appellant to show cause why the appeals should not be dismissed because each appeal in this criminal matter is taken from an order that is interlocutory. The appellant filed a response to the notice opposing dismissal, contending that each of the appeals is taken from a ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases