GRIM v. STATE BAR

Docket No. S014192.

53 Cal.3d 21 (1991)

805 P.2d 941

278 Cal. Rptr. 682

DOUGLAS PAUL GRIM, Petitioner, v. THE STATE BAR OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Supreme Court of California.

March 14, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Douglas Paul Grim, in pro. per., Margolis & Margolis, and Arthur L. Margolis for Petitioner.

Diane C. Yu, Richard J. Zanassi, Sandra T. Larson and Gael T. InfandeWeiss for Respondent.


OPINION

THE COURT.

We review the recommendation of the Review Department of the State Bar Court (review department) that petitioner Douglas Paul Grim be disbarred from the practice of law for having wilfully misappropriated over $5,500 of client funds.

Petitioner contends that disbarment is excessive. He argues that the review department's conclusions of law are unsupported by the evidence, that it failed to properly weigh...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases