VALDEZ v. TRAMEL

Nos. 76260, 76310 and 76311.

581 So.2d 161 (1991)

Steven VALDEZ, Etc., Petitioner, v. Tom TRAMEL, Sheriff, etc., Respondent. Lawrence A. Demers, Petitioner, v. Tom TRAMEL, Sheriff, Etc., Respondents. Kevin J. ORY, Petitioner, v. Tom TRAMEL, Sheriff, Etc., Respondents.

Supreme Court of Florida.

June 20, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Dennis Roberts, Public Defender and Jonathan W. Dingus, Asst. Public Defender, Third Judicial Circuit, Lake City, for Valdez.

John J. Terhune, Live Oak, for Demers and Ory.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., and Edward C. Hill, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for respondent.


OVERTON, Justice.

These consolidated petitions seek review of McCaskill v. McMillan, 563 So.2d 800 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990), in which the First District Court of Appeal certified the question presented regarding the interpretation of rule 3.133(b)(6),1 Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, concerning the timely charging of defendants by indictment or information as a matter of great public importance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases