STATE v. CURRY

Nos. 24609-7-I; 25767-6-I.

62 Wn. App. 676 (1991)

814 P.2d 1252

THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. TONY ANTHONY CURRY, Appellant. THE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. ANTONIO LOPEZ, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

September 3, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Elaine Winters of Washington Appellate Defender Association, for appellants.

Norm Maleng, Prosecuting Attorney, and Lisa Marchese and Pamela Mohr, Deputies, for respondent.


PEKELIS, J.

The principal issue in these cases, consolidated on appeal, is whether constitutional considerations require the entry of formal findings of fact to support the imposition of court costs and the victim's penalty assessment (VPA). A secondary and related issue is whether the sentencing judges in both Curry's and Lopez's cases implicitly found that the defendants were unable in the present or in the future to make these payments. We answer both questions...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases