1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. So.2d
  4. 590 So.2d
  5. 590 So.2d 148 (1991)
 

BELL v. BELL

89-1816.

590 So.2d 148 (1991)

Cecil BELL v. William BELL.

Supreme Court of Alabama.

Rehearing Denied November 8, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cecil Bell, pro se.

George A. Monk of Merrill, Porch, Dillon & Fite, Anniston, for appellee.

HORNSBY, Chief Justice.

Cecil Bell sued William Bell because of a dispute over an east-west boundary line. He also sued Wylie Bell and William T. McElroy because of a dispute over a north-south boundary line. The trial court entered a judgment in favor of defendant William Bell in regard to the east-west boundary line dispute.1 Cecil Bell filed a motion for new trial, which the trial court denied, and Cecil Bell appeals. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases