Competent evidence in the record supports the trial court's conclusion that the arresting officer had an adequate description of the defendant, that he had observed defendant's furtive behavior before stopping the defendant without forcibly detaining him, and that he did not arrest the defendant until after the complainant's identification. The arresting officer exercised his common-law right to inquire which was legitimately activated by a founded suspicion that criminal...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.