1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 164 A.D.2d
  5. 164 A.D.2d 574 (1991)
 

CONSULTING ENGRS. v. DOT

164 A.D.2d 574 (1991)

In the Matter of Consulting Engineers Council of New York State, Inc., et al., Appellants, v. New York State Department of Transportation et al., Respondents

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, Third Department.

January 3, 1991

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mackenzie Smith Lewis Michell & Hughes (Dennis P. Hennigan of counsel), for appellants.

Robert Abrams, Attorney-General (Peter H. Schiff of counsel), for respondents.

CASEY, J. P., MIKOLL, LEVINE and HARVEY, JJ., concur.

YESAWICH, JR., J.

Petitioners, organizations composed of professional engineers and consulting engineering firms, challenge the professional consultant selection process of respondent Department of Transportation (hereinafter DOT). A feature of this process is the establishment by DOT of maximum overhead and salary guidelines, ostensibly to ensure that the amount paid to consultant firms is fair and reasonable...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases