1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 62 Wn.
  5. 62 Wn. App. 10 (1991)
 

ESERHUT v. HEISTER

No. 26123-1-I.

62 Wn. App. 10 (1991)

812 P.2d 902

LEN ESERHUT, Respondent, v. STEVE HEISTER, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

July 22, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Norman W. Cohen and Cohen & Keith-Miller, Inc., P.S., for appellants.

Richard J. Wotipka and Broihier & Wotipka; Douglass A. North and Maltman, Weber, Reed, North & Ahrens, for respondent.

BAKER, J.

Steve Heister, Tom Weist and Gary Venn (hereinafter coemployees), appeal a judgment in favor of the plaintiff, Leonard Eserhut. On remand after an earlier appeal,1 the trial court found that the coemployees had the requisite intent to establish liability for the tort of intentional interference with a business relationship. We reverse.

FACTS

Eserhut was employed by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases