STATE EX REL. PIA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS, INC. v. OHIO CERTIFICATE OF NEED REVIEW BD.

Nos. 90-605 and 90-777.

60 Ohio St. 3d 11 (1991)

THE STATE, EX REL. PIA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS, INC., D.B.A. PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE OF NORTHEASTERN OHIO, APPELLANT AND CROSS-APPELLEE, v. OHIO CERTIFICATE OF NEED REVIEW BOARD ET AL., APPELLEES; CHARTER HOSPITAL OF AKRON, INC. ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS. THE STATE, EX REL. PIA PSYCHIATRIC HOSPITALS, INC., D.B.A. PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE OF COLUMBUS, APPELLANT, v. OHIO CERTIFICATE OF NEED REVIEW BOARD ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 15, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Thomas W. Hess; Bonner & O'Connell and John T. Brennan, Jr.; McDonald, Hopkins, Burke & Haber Co., L.P.A., R. Jeffrey Pollock and Dona Arnold, for appellant PIA Psychiatric Hospitals, Inc. in case No. 90-605.

Buckingham, Doolittle & Burroughs and Thomas W. Hess; Bonner & O'Connell and John T. Brennan, Jr., for appellant PIA Psychiatric Hospitals, Inc. in case No. 90-777.

Hahn, Loeser & Parks, Mark E. Staib, Jeffrey D. Van Niel and Terry A. Donner, for appellee and cross-appellant Laurelwood Hospital in case No. 90-605.

Carlile, Patchen, Murphy & Allison, Donald A. Antrim, Noreen S. Wolff and Jay F. McKirahan, for appellee and cross-appellant Charter Hospital of Akron in case Nos. 90-605 and 90-777.

Lee I. Fisher, attorney general; McCarthy, Palmer, Volkema & Becker and William C. Becker, Jr.; Ransier & Ransier and Kathleen Hayes Ransier, for appellee Ohio Department of Mental Health in case Nos. 90-605 and 90-777.

Bricker & Eckler, Gretchen A. McBeath and Scott W. Taebel, for appellee Harding Hospital in case No. 90-777.


Per Curiam.

For a writ of mandamus to issue, PIA N.E. and PIA Columbus must show that they are entitled to the CON Review Board's performance of a clear legal duty and that they have no plain and adequate remedy in the ordinary course of law. State, ex rel. Pressley, v. Indus. Comm. (1967), 11 Ohio St.2d 141, 40 O.O. 2d 141, 228 N.E.2d 631, paragraph ten of the syllabus. Therefore, our review must concentrate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases