McINTOSH v. STATE FARM

No. CX-91-261.

474 N.W.2d 227 (1991)

Twaya Vienna McINTOSH, Appellant, v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Granted October 16, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas F. Van Horn, St. Paul, for appellant.

Bradley T. Cosgriff, Lee L. LaBore & Associates, Hopkins, for respondent.

Heard, considered and decided by CRIPPEN, P.J., and NORTON and SHORT, JJ.


OPINION

SHORT, Judge.

In a case involving insurance coverage, Twaya McIntosh argues the trial court erred as a matter of law in granting summary judgment for State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company because (1) innocent persons should be compensated for all injuries arising out of the use of an uninsured's automobile, and (2) an "accident" is not a prerequisite to the payment of no-fault benefits. We disagree and affirm.

FACTS

The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases