POMAZI v. CONSERVATION COMMISSION

(14306)

220 Conn. 476 (1991)

JANICE POMAZI v. CONSERVATION COMMISSION OF THE TOWN OF REDDING ET AL.

Supreme Court of Connecticut.

Decision released December 3, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nancy Burton, for the appellant (plaintiff).

Edwin C. Pearson filed a brief for the appellee (named defendant).

Helen L. McGonigle, for the appellees (defendant Luciano Angeloni et al.).

Richard A. O'Connor, with whom, on the brief, was Melinda Monson, for the appellees (defendant Gary R. Michael et al.).

PETERS, C. J., SHEA, GLASS, COVELLO and BORDEN, JS.


BORDEN, J.

The dispositive issue of this appeal is whether the plaintiff, Janice Pomazi, established classical aggrievement to appeal from the action of the named defendant, the Redding conservation commission, in failing to revoke the inland wetlands and watercourses license of the defendants Gary R. Michael and Dennis N. Michael. The plaintiff appealed to the trial court from that action,1 naming as defendants the conservation commission...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases