Ordered that the amended judgment is affirmed.
The defendant contends that his plea of guilty to criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree was insufficient since he did not expressly admit the required intent, nor did he admit facts from which such intent could be inferred. We disagree. The defendant, by his plea of guilty, forfeited the right to review of any nonjurisdictional defects in the matter (see, People v Fernandez,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
