SIPPEL v. CITY OF ST. FRANCIS

No. 90-2307.

164 Wis.2d 527 (1991)

476 N.W.2d 579

Elroy J. SIPPEL and Sylvia G. Sippel, Plaintiffs-Respondents-Cross Appellants, v. CITY OF ST. FRANCIS, a Wisconsin Municipal Corporation, Defendant-Appellant-Cross Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin.

Decided September 10, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

For the defendant-appellant-cross respondent the cause was submitted on the briefs of Richard H. Staats, city attorney for the City of St. Francis, of Staats & Staats, Cudahy.

For the plaintiffs-respondents-cross appellants the cause was submitted on the briefs of Thomas L. Frenn of Frenn & Jakus, West Allis.

Before Moser, P.J., Sullivan and LaRocque, JJ.


SULLIVAN, J.

The City appeals from a bench trial judgment requiring it to pay an apartment complex owner for a constructive taking as a result of street improvements. The owners cross-appeal from a jury verdict which found special benefits conferred upon the complex as a result of the improvements. We conclude that the owners' loss of access to twenty parking spaces does not constitute a constructive taking because the owners were not denied all or substantially all...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases