Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
The trial court properly permitted the People to call as rebuttal witnesses the undercover officer who had testified on the prosecution's direct case that he purchased $20 worth of cocaine from the defendant, and the arresting officer who also testified on the direct case against the defendant. Their testimony served to contradict the defendant's claim that he merely acted as the undercover officer's agent to purchase the cocaine...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
