1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 228 Cal.App.3d
  5. 228 Cal.App.3d 454 (1991)
 

MESSIH v. LEVINE

Docket No. B046114.

228 Cal.App.3d 454 (1991)

278 Cal. Rptr. 825

SHUKRY MESSIH, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. HENRY LEVINE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Seven.

March 12, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Shukry Messih, in pro. per., and David J. Duchrow for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Stockdale, Peckham & Werner and Paul F. Sowa for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

WOODS (Fred), J.

Almost seven years after it was filed, a complaint was dismissed pursuant to the mandatory five-year dismissal statute (Code Civ. Proc.,1 § 583.3102). Appellant claims the limitation period was automatically tolled by his postarbitration trial de novo request, by the filing of his appeals, and because...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases