CHICAGO PARK DIST. v. RICHARDSON

No. 1-89-2907.

581 N.E.2d 97 (1991)

220 Ill. App.3d 696

163 Ill.Dec. 146

CHICAGO PARK DISTRICT, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Prince Erick RICHARDSON, Defendant-Appellant.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division.

Rehearing Denied October 31, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael H. Cole and Associates, Chicago, for defendant-appellant.

James C. Murray, Jr. and Frank J. Saibert of Katten Muchin & Zavis, Chicago, for plaintiff-appellee.


Justice McMORROW delivered the opinion of the court:

Defendant, Prince Erick Richardson (Richardson), appeals from summary judgment for plaintiff, the Chicago Park District (the District), ruling that the parties had entered into a binding and enforceable contract of settlement of Richardson's claims against the District and ordering Richardson to execute the agreement and claims release. On appeal, Richardson contends that the court improperly denied his motion for...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases