STATE v. SCHILLING

No. C9-90-2606.

474 N.W.2d 203 (1991)

STATE of Minnesota, Respondent, v. Dean Arthur SCHILLING, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

August 20, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., St. Paul, Michael E. Orman, Charles C. Kallemeyn, Orman & Nord, Duluth, for respondent.

John M. Stuart, State Public Defender, Minneapolis, for appellant.

Considered and decided by KLAPHAKE, P.J., and LANSING and DAVIES, JJ.


OPINION

DAVIES, Judge.

Appellant challenges the admission of hearsay statements at trial and claims a violation of his right to confront the witnesses against him. We reverse.

FACTS

On March 14, 1990, a pick-up truck was stopped for speeding. As the officer approached the truck, he observed it "rocking." He suspected there was an attempt to switch drivers. By the time the officer got a clear view, two of the three men in the front seat...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases