1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 123 N.J.
  5. 123 N.J. 547 (1991)
 

NESMITH v. WALSH TRUCKING CO.

123 N.J. 547 (1991)

589 A.2d 596

ALNETHA NESMITH AND QUEENIE NESMITH, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. WALSH TRUCKING COMPANY AND DONALD P. BRADEN, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided February 14, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Sovel argued the cause for appellants (Freedman and Lorry, attorneys; Stanley B. Gruber, on the brief).

Walter Koprowski, Jr. argued the cause for respondents (Velardo & Koprowski, attorneys).

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the judgment of the Appellate Division substantially for the reasons set forth in Judge Shebell's dissenting opinion. 247 N.J.Super. 360, 371-373, 589 A.2d 613, 619-620 (1989).

The standards for determining the permissible scope of expert testimony are set forth in State v. Kelly, 97 N.J. 178, 208, 478 A...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases