STASNY v. DEPT. OF COMMERCE

No. CO-91-267.

474 N.W.2d 195 (1991)

George STASNY, BY Lorraine STASNY, General Guardian, Petitioner, v. MINNESOTA DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Review Dismissed October 11, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Todd P. Young, St. Paul, for petitioner.

Hubert H. Humphrey, III, Atty. Gen., Carolyn Ham, Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen., St. Paul, for respondent.

Laura J. Hanson, Charles E. Spevacek, Minneapolis, for amicus curiae Federated Mut. Ins. Co.

Considered and decided by PETERSON, P.J., and FOLEY, and KALITOWSKI, JJ.


OPINION

KALITOWSKI, Judge.

Petitioner challenges the validity of Minn.R. 2740.1600, subpt. 2.A. (1989), arguing that the Commerce Department exceeded its authority in promulgating the rule because the rule conflicts with the enabling legislation, the Minnesota Comprehensive Health Insurance Act of 1976, Minn.Stat. ch. 62E.

FACTS

In 1976, the Minnesota legislature enacted the Comprehensive Health...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases