1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 245 N.J.
  5. 245 N.J. Super. 418 (1991)
 

PHILLIPS v. CURIALE

245 N.J. Super. 418 (1991)

586 A.2d 245

ANGELICA PHILLIPS, AS ADMINISTRATRIX AND ADMINISTRATRIX AD PROSEQUENDUM OF THE ESTATE OF WALTER PHILLIPS, DECEDENT, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. MARK CURIALE AND CHARLES WATSON, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS, AND FMC CORPORATION, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided January 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph Albanese argued the cause for appellant (Joseph Albanese and Fontanella & Benevento, attorneys; Joseph Albanese and Alfred E. Fontanella on the brief).

William W. Hart, Jr., Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondents (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General, attorney; Michael R. Clancy, Assistant Attorney General, of counsel; William W. Hart, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges J.H. COLEMAN, DREIER and LANDAU.

LANDAU, J.A.D.

This appeal arises from the Law Division grant of summary judgment favorable to defendants-respondents Mark Curiale and Charles Watson on the complaint of plaintiff-appellant Angelica Phillips, as Administratrix and Administratrix ad Prosequendum of the Estate of Walter Phillips, Decedent (Administratrix).1 Administratrix sued those defendants and defendant FMC Corporation for damages allegedly arising out of injuries suffered...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases