FARRINGTON v. BUREAU OF NAT. AFFAIRS

Nos. 89-724 & 90-1033.

596 A.2d 58 (1991)

Nicholas G. FARRINGTON, Appellant, v. BUREAU OF NATIONAL AFFAIRS, INC., et al., Appellees.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals.

Decided September 13, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nicholas G. Farrington, pro se.

Paul E. Mirengoff, with whom A. Neal Barkus, Washington, D.C., was on the brief, for appellees.

Before FARRELL and WAGNER, Associate Judges, and GALLAGHER, Senior Judge.


GALLAGHER, Senior Judge:

Appellant sued his employer and his supervisors for defamation based on the limited publication of statements made by his supervisors in an unfavorable evaluation of his work as an editor.1 The trial court granted the appellees' motion for summary judgment on the basis that appellant's defamation claim was precluded by the defense of consent which rendered the publication...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases