I.A. CONST. v. DEPT. OF TRANSP.


139 Pa.Commw. 509 (1991)

591 A.2d 1146

I.A. CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Individually and for the Use and Benefit of H. Miniscalco & Sons, Inc. and H. Miniscalco & Sons, Inc., Petitioners, v. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Respondent. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Petitioner, v. I.A. CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION, Individually and for the Use and Benefit of H. Miniscalco & Sons, Inc. and H. Miniscalco & Sons, Inc., Respondents.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania.

Decided May 6, 1991.

Reargument Denied July 15, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mark F. Brancato, with him, Paul A. Logan, Powell, Trachtman, Logan & Carrle, P.C., King of Prussia, for petitioners/respondents I.A. Const. Corp. et al.

James W. Kutz, Asst. Counsel, with him, John L. Heaton, Chief Counsel, Harrisburg, for respondent/petitioner, Department of Transp.

Before DOYLE and McGINLEY, JJ., and BARRY, Senior Judge.


BARRY, Senior Judge.

I.A. Construction Corp. (I.A.), individually and on behalf of H. Miniscalco & Sons, Inc. (Miniscalco), Miniscalco, individually, and the Department of Transportation (DOT) have filed cross-appeals from an order of the Pennsylvania Board of Claims (Board) which ordered DOT to pay damages to both I.A. and Miniscalco; the damages awarded were less than the amount sought by I.A. and Miniscalco.

I.A. was the low bidder on a project to reconstruct...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases