MITCHELL v. CITY OF CHICAGO

No. 1-90-1210, 1-90-1253.

583 N.E.2d 60 (1991)

221 Ill. App.3d 1017

164 Ill.Dec. 506

Bruce E. MITCHELL and Mary J. Mitchell, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. CITY OF CHICAGO, a municipal corporation, and Chicago Transit Authority, a municipal corporation, Defendants-Appellees.

Appellate Court of Illinois, First District, Fourth Division.

November 7, 1991.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hayes & Power, Chicago (Joseph A. Power Jr., Thomas G. Siracusa, David A. Novoselsky, Linda A. Bryceland, of counsel), for plaintiffs-appellants.

Kelly R. Welsh, Corp. Counsel of City of Chicago (Lawrence Rosenthal, Deputy Corp. Counsel, Benna Ruth Solomon, Chief Asst. Corp. Counsel, Michelle A. Hutchinson, Asst. Corp. Counsel, of counsel), for defendant-appellee City of Chicago.

William Farley, P. Scott Neville, Jr., Chicago, for defendant-appellee Chicago Transit Authority.


Presiding Justice JIGANTI delivered the opinion of the court:

These consolidated appeals stem from a negligence action brought by the plaintiffs, Bruce E. Mitchell and his wife Mary J. Mitchell, against the defendants, the Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) and the City of Chicago. On motions by the CTA and the City, the trial court granted summary judgments in favor of both of the defendants and against the plaintiffs on the grounds that no duty was owed to the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases